UER

UniERP Research

Six rungs · two engines · one product
Competitive position

What we would actually defend

Five claims, each stated so it can be argued with. Plus the list of things we lose, because a position document that only lists strengths is marketing, not analysis.

1. Compliance as architecture, not as a report

Competitors report to HEC. We run the process. A RegulatoryTrack object with stages, evidence packs, expiry clocks and validated DCF export means NAVTTC, PEC, NBEAC, BISE, PMC and EOBI are all the same code with different configuration.

Defensible because

No competitor has any version of this — not SAP, not Ellucian, not OpenEduCat, not the 159 Pakistani companies.

2. Evidence as a by-product of correct operation

Read the NAC-TVS 1000 marks. Teaching load per teacher. Timetables. Lesson plans. Practical notebooks checked. Question banks. Assessor pools. Mid-term results. Employer directory. Placements and appointment letters. Counselling records. Parent-teacher meetings. Inventory. Budgets. Hostel capacity. Fire extinguishers. Alumni contacts.

Defensible because

An ERP that runs an institute correctly produces the accreditation evidence continuously. The 70% pass threshold becomes a live dashboard instead of a six-month scramble before inspection.

3. One engine, six rungs, three regulators' vocabularies

GradingStrategy covers percentage marks through competency/NVQF to OSCE. RegulatoryTrack covers NAVTTC, HEC, PEC, NBEAC, BISE and PMC. One Course object carries a trade, a credit, an NVQF level, a delivery mode and an external assessor.

Defensible because

Adding a discipline costs two rows in a config table. NVQF itself is a single continuous ladder: QAB awards levels 1-5, HEC awards 6-8. The product shape mirrors the regulator's own qualification structure.

4. Brownfield, not rip-and-replace

25 public universities are on SAP via MAKTAB, funded by US$73.5M of World Bank money. We are the layer that makes that system usable — exam cell, fee counter, HEC returns, accreditation workflow, student app.

Defensible because

Research on Pakistani institutions found ERP success driven by information, system and service quality rather than by missing modules. The installed SAP is fine. Its users are not served.

5. The bottom of the pyramid

The mohalla trade academy has no competitor at all — not one product targets the individual operator with a PKR 2,000/month WhatsApp-native system.

Defensible because

Zero competitors. Low ARPU, but it is the volume, the data, and the referral funnel into R2.

Where we lose, stated plainly

LMS depth

Blackboard is the HEC standard and Canvas has the deepest API ecosystem. We integrate; we do not compete.

US grant and research compliance

SAP Grants Management, Cayuse, InfoEd. Structurally unreachable and irrelevant in Pakistan.

US financial aid

FAFSA, Pell, Title IV. A US federal programme with no Pakistani equivalent.

Peer-scale uptime

Penn State generates ~2TB of LMS data daily across 89,000 students. We will not match that and should not try early.

Accessibility certification depth

Blackboard via Ally, Canvas via a built-in checker. We audit and improve; we do not seek certification early.

Payroll depth

A multi-tenant PHP HRMS with payroll already exists and is available on the target infrastructure. Reuse rather than rebuild.

Price

KiddieCove at PKR 3,000/month per campus and Skoo at PKR 5,000-15,000/month set a low anchor in schools.

Free

OpenEduCat's LGPL community edition is genuinely free, has 74 named modules, G2 4.5 stars and a partner program.

The uncomfortable structural point

Dilution

"Handles academy to university" is a feature-matrix claim. "Serves three segments profitably" is a business. Each rung added is a segment diluted. Medical and dental are worth building because the segment is funded and unserved. Defence clearance and media production should be configured from the core, not built, because neither has enough institutions to justify the effort.

The second uncomfortable point

Free

OpenEduCat’s LGPL community edition is genuinely free, has 74 named modules, holds G2 4.5 stars, runs a three-tier partner programme plus an OEM programme, operates a services arm, and already runs the same multi-country landing-page motion we are proposing to enter. It is not a distant competitor. It is a well-resourced international operation that has already written the Pakistan pages.